Papacy in Scripture VI: Introduction to St. Peter in the New Testament

Continuing my series of posts on the biblical roots of the papacy, we have finally come to the NT. In a book that was influential in my own conversion to Catholicism, the then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (current Pope Benedict XVI), wrote that “it would be misguided to pounce immediately on the classic proof text for the primacy, Matthew 16:13-20.”1 Thus, I will not begin with Matthew 16, but will rather end this series with several posts focusing on different aspects of that passage. 

That being said, please bear in mind that I am not intending any sort of deductive argument based on any of the observations I make in this present post, I am merely attempting to set the stage for the prominent role St. Peter played in the NT as a framework for showing in later posts how this prominent role is in fact an office within the Church Jesus institutes, fulfilling the Kingdom of Israel from the OT, transforming its very structure and essence. 

We can begin this discussion with the list of apostles Jesus gathered around Himself. In his last publication before he died, the Romanian Orthodox (formerly Lutheran) church historian Jaroslav Pelikan makes some very interesting comments based upon the textual traditions concerning the list of apostles in the NT. Dr. Pelikan makes the following observation: 

“the name Judas had come last not only in the Gospel of Luke, but in all three of those lists [of the apostles]. Within all three, moreover, the order varies in other ways as well, and even more so in some manuscripts…except for the one striking fact, which it is extremely difficult to explain as an accident, that the name Peter always comes first, as it still does in Acts.”2 

Writing further on the same page, Pelikan comments: 

“The Gospel of Matthew…also stipulates ‘The names of the twelve apostles are these: first, Simon, who is called Peter’; the word ‘first’ in this passage is an adjective, [prōtos], not an adverb (Matt. 10:2), which would seem to give it more significance than merely that of a sequence in an itemized list.”3 

In other words, had the list used “first” adverbial, as in “first Simon, second, Andrew,” etc., then the word “first” would simply modify Simon Peter’s place in the list. Pelikan points out that it is used not adverbally, but adjectively, thus the word “first” here modifies Simon Peter himself, as the (proper) noun, and not simply his name coming first in the list. Thus it is not simply being used as “first there’s Simon Peter, then there’s Andrew, and then…”, but rather is closer in meaning to, “the one in the position of primacy is Simon Peter.” He is the first, as in preeminent one.

In the next post, we’ll turn to St. Mark’s Gospel, following some of the insights of the evangelical Protestant scholar Dr. Richard Bauckham. 

Select Bibliography: 

Brown, Raymond E., Karl P. Donfried, and John Reumann, ed. Peter in the New Testament: A Collaborative Assessment by Protestant and Roman Catholic Scholars. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1973. 

Cullmann, Oscar. Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1962. 

Pelikan, Jaroslav. Acts. Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Brazos Press, 2005. 

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Called to Communion: Understanding the Church Today. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1996 (1991).

  1. Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Called to Communion: Understanding the Church Today (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1996 [1991]), 48. []
  2. Jaroslav Pelikan, Acts, Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Brazos Press, 2005), 87. []
  3. Pelikan, Acts, 87. []

8 thoughts on “Papacy in Scripture VI: Introduction to St. Peter in the New Testament”

    1. Ne teneas aurum totum quod splendet ut aurum. Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
      But, in truth….
      Iesus, tanto nomini nullum par elogium.
      And, by the way….
      Si hoc legere scis, nimis eruditionis habes.

      1. Josh, taking your comments in reverse order. I am NOT overeducated; I heartily agree with your 2nd comment completely; and I love J.R.R. Tolkien so to find a quote from him in Latin is pretty neat—-I take it you’re translating part of Bilbo’s poem about Aragorn here. (although both Shakespeare and Cervantes have something similar in their works).

  1. Too funny.
    In point of fact, a still earlier reference to “all that glitters is not gold” is found in Thomas Becon’s “The Relics of Rome.” ( Didn’t know that myself. Thank Google for that one.)
    Hope your classes are going well in the new semester and the family is happy and healthy.

  2. Oh dear, the old, “will you excuse me while I pace the wo1&7e#82mn;s room” routine. And then pretending to wash your hands when someone walks in, or darting into the nearest stall and pretending to pee… again. I think men have the right idea though. Just bring a large book in there with you while wearing a pained expression. That’s good for at least 30 minutes.

  3. Hello admin ! I read your posts everyday and i must say you have
    high quality content here. Your website deserves to go viral.
    You need initial traffic only. How to go viral fast? Search for; forbesden’s tools

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe without commenting